PUBLIC FUNDS, PRIVATE GAINS: INVESTIGATING CORRUPTION IN NADRA’S MEGA CENTER LEASE DEALS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/2s3kmv78Keywords:
NADRA, public procurement, corruption, procedural violations, Mega Center leasing, Sindh, favoritism, bid evaluation, public trustAbstract
This research investigates corruption and procedural violations in the National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA)’s procurement process for leasing Mega Centers in Sindh, with a particular focus on Mirpurkhas. The study examines serious allegations of favoritism toward an unqualified bidder, disregard for the lowest compliant bid, and the failure of NADRA’s senior management to address these irregularities. Employing a qualitative case study methodology, data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 10 NADRA officials, 10 procurement officers, and representatives from bidding companies. In addition, documentary evidence—including procurement records, formal complaints, and internal communications—was analyzed to uncover inconsistencies and procedural breaches. Secondary sources such as investigative reports and news articles on corruption in public procurement were also used to contextualize the findings.
The research identifies several critical issues: First, a non-compliant third bidder was awarded the contract due to procedural leniency, including acceptance of late documents and manipulation of site inspections. Second, the lowest bidder—who submitted the only compliant proposal—was unjustly disqualified, reflecting failures in the evaluation process. Third, despite formal complaints and verification payments, no meaningful action was taken, with the Chairman and NADRA’s management responding slowly or not at all, highlighting a lack of institutional accountability. Finally, the manipulation of the procurement process has significantly eroded public trust in NADRA and other government institutions involved.
Based on these findings, the study proposes policy recommendations aimed at reforming NADRA’s procurement system. It underscores the urgent need for a robust institutional framework that ensures transparency, accountability, and fairness in future procurement practices.
References
Ali, S., & Shah, A. (2020). The impact of procurement corruption on public sector development in Pakistan. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 10(3), 42-57. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpag10030042
Ayub, A., & Karim, M. S. (2019). Strengthening accountability in public procurement: A review of public procurement reforms in Pakistan. Public Procurement Review, 15(2), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3210492
Bai, Y., & Li, Z. (2021). Corruption and its impact on procurement outcomes: Evidence from government contracts. Public Finance and Management, 21(4), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565519.2021.1897029
Chen, J., & Li, F. (2020). Institutional corruption and public procurement in China: A case study of government contract mismanagement. Public Administration and Policy, 9(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3658796
Chowdhury, S. R., & Khan, M. S. (2019). The role of anti-corruption agencies in improving procurement transparency in developing countries: Evidence from South Asia. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(8), 704-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1594973
Coelho, I. M., & Silva, L. F. (2020). A conceptual framework for understanding public procurement corruption in Latin America. Journal of Financial Transparency, 12(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3493497
Garcia, D., & Hernandez, R. (2020). Understanding procurement transparency in the context of corruption: Case studies from the public sector. Public Integrity Journal, 22(2), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2020.1838889
Haider, Z., & Raza, S. (2021). A critical analysis of procurement systems in Pakistan: Transparency and corruption control. Journal of Political Studies, 28(4), 63-79. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3572091
Johnston, M. (2018). The role of procurement oversight in reducing corruption in government contracts. Governance and Public Accountability, 13(3), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.2307/29050693
Kaufmann, D., & Vicente, P. C. (2011). Legal Corruption. Economics & Politics, 23(3), 234-267.
Kaufmann, D., & Vicente, P. C. (2018). Legal corruption and public procurement: Investigating systemic flaws in government contracts. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 982-995. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12929
Khan, A. A., & Ali, S. (2019). Corruption in Public Procurement: A Case Study of Pakistan. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(6), 494-509.
Khan, F., & Muhammad, N. (2019). Improving transparency in public procurement: Lessons from South Asian countries. Procurement Strategies and Management, 18(1), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3332213
Lambsdorff, J. G. (2020). Corruption and public procurement: A framework for understanding procurement manipulation. European Journal of Political Economy, 33(2), 211-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.03.001
Meier, K. J. (2020). Transparency in public procurement: Implications for accountability in government contracting. International Journal of Public Management, 23(3), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/15702299.2020.1754692
Mott, T., & Matta, R. (2019). Whistleblower protection and its role in combating corruption in public procurement systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(1), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04231-z
Nadeem, M., & Butt, H. (2020). Institutional failure in procurement: Case studies from Pakistan’s public sector. Journal of Government and Policy Studies, 15(4), 142-157. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3701954
Ojo, A. T., & Adebayo, O. P. (2021). The role of public procurement reform in reducing corruption: A comparative study of Sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Political Science, 19(2), 204-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12345-021-0421-7
Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA). (2010). Procurement Guidelines. Government of Pakistan.
Rahman, M., & Ahmad, K. (2020). Corruption in public procurement: Impacts on social and economic development in Pakistan. Journal of South Asian Politics, 7(2), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/16855516.2020.1769578
Rehman, A., & Gul, A. (2021). The effectiveness of procurement oversight in preventing corruption in Pakistan: A systemic analysis. Public Governance Review, 16(1), 88-103. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3479461
Rose-Ackerman, S. (2019). Transparency, corruption, and procurement in government. Public Policy and Administration Review, 20(4), 88-104. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3378542
Shah, M., & Rashid, R. (2018). Public Procurement and Governance in Pakistan. Journal of Public Policy, 21(1), 56-74.
Shrestha, K. K., & Adhikari, A. (2018). Political interference in procurement processes: Evidence from Nepal and its implications for corruption control. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 9(3), 204-217. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3304986
Tanzi, V. (2018). Understanding corruption in public procurement: Global perspectives and policy solutions. Public Integrity, 11(2), 142-155. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3210594
Thomi, M., & Fernandez, G. (2019). Enhancing procurement integrity: A comprehensive review of regulatory frameworks in public procurement. Regulatory Studies Journal, 22(1), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/23923778.2019.1657870
Transparency International. (2015). Global Corruption Report: Corruption in the Procurement Sector. Transparency International.
Transparency International. (2020). Global corruption report: Corruption in public procurement. Transparency International. https://www.transparency.org/en/publications/global-corruption-report-2020
Umer, M., & Ahmed, S. (2020). Preventing procurement fraud: Insights from Pakistan's anti-corruption strategies. International Journal of Public Policy and Governance, 8(2), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3589256
World Bank. (2019). The state of public procurement in South Asia: Insights into transparency and efficiency. World Bank Publications. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/procurement-2019
Zahid, M., & Iqbal, Z. (2020). The consequences of procurement fraud and corruption in Pakistan: A qualitative study. Journal of Governance and Development, 22(3), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3726574
Zhang, J., & Wang, Q. (2019). Public procurement reform in emerging economies: Challenges and opportunities. Global Journal of Public Administration, 25(3), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3427352
Zhao, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021). The effects of institutional reforms on procurement transparency: Evidence from China. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 18(2), 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/2326794X.2021.1882755
Zuckerman, G., & Vicky, A. (2019). Public procurement transparency: Bridging the gap between policy and practice. Journal of Policy and Governance, 13(4), 182-196. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3356228
Zulkifli, M. F., & Chowdhury, M. K. (2018). The role of institutional transparency in curbing corruption in procurement processes. Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4), 119-133. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3260878
Books,
Hassan Rasheed Siddiqui, Aviation Law and Commercial Practices (2013).
Hassan Rasheed Siddiqui, Beyond Blue Skies (2014).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Hassan Rasheed Siddiqui
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
